Justin Vela

Archive for the ‘Asia’ Category

Flashback a year ago to Nepal…

leave a comment »

Santoshi Shresthei was shot in the thigh by a ricochet bullet as the police unsuccessfully attempted to use force to end the Tharu's bandha in Chitwan. Nepal. March 2009.

HELSINKI-Just over a year ago I was working in Nepal’s restive Terai region.

See a gallery of images here.


Written by Justin Vela

April 11, 2010 at 12:34 pm

Posted in Asia

Tagged with , , ,

A Poster….The Bridge to Freedom Foundation….Human Trafficking…

with one comment

HELSINKI-One of my images from a story on human trafficking in rural Bihar, India is being used in a poster by the Bridge To Freedom Foundation in Washington DC.

Click here to see the poster. If your screen is small you might have to scroll down a bit.

You can also see the poster more directly by visiting the Bridge To Freedom Foundation Facebook page here.

Click here to download the poster directly.

The poster is also available as a flier which you can download here.

For more of my images related to human trafficking see the slideshow below.

Human trafficking is a subject I am attempting to continue with. In the course of my travels in the past two years I have identified several different trafficking hotspots which I would like to return to in order to explain the different ways that modern day slavery occurs and who is responsible. The end result for the project will be a website, book, and interactive gallery exhibition meant to educate the general public on what human trafficking is. I am currently looking for NGOs and other organizations to collaborate with on this work, as well as seeking editorial assignments.

Written by Justin Vela

January 9, 2010 at 9:14 am

A package from Bihar…

leave a comment »

Save the Children t-shirt, pens, and notebooks sent to me from India. 7 January 2010.

HELSINKI-A package arrived at the apartment where I am crashed in Helsinki, Finland.

There were dozens of stamps. All across the right side of the package, which was was held together by red tape. Written on the back the sender’s address was in Patna, the capital of Bihar State, India.

The package was a Christmas present from Katie-ji, who traveled with me during some of my time in Bihar last August. She knew I had developed a fondness for Save the Children pens, which are attached to a convenient loop and can hang from your neck. Perfect for field research which involves a lot of shuffling of bags, cameras, notebooks, and who knows what else.

Villagers in the impoerished state of Bihar, India. August 2009.

Villagers in Bihar State, India. August 2009.

Katie-ji has also brought my attention to the new Save the Children India website. Check it out here.

Along with making my day, the pens will get good use in a few weeks as I work on stories about an ostrich farm and the Orthodox Brotherhood of Pokrova here in Finland. The notebooks I’ll save for the next piece of work on human trafficking that I do. The shirt I can simply look awesome in.

Katie-ji in rural Bihar, India. August 2009.

Written by Justin Vela

January 7, 2010 at 10:30 am

Posted in Asia

Tagged with , , , , , , , , ,

India. New Delhi and Rural Bihar. July-August 2009.

leave a comment »

A woman whose son was trafficked in rural Bihar State, India. August 2009.

Villagers in Bihar State, India. August 2009.

A roadway in the state of Bihar, India. August 2009.

Simu was brought to work in New Delhi from Kolkata. A victim of human trafficking, her trafficker abandoned her after she became pregnant with his child. She now works in a childcare center in New Delhi, India. July 2009.

A body is burned along the Yamuna River in New Delhi, India. July 2009.

all images copyright Justin Vela 2009.

I will be in the Middle East from 16 December.

Written by Justin Vela

December 14, 2009 at 12:06 am

Posted in Asia

Tagged with ,

The 60 Year Success of the Chinese Communist Party…my recent article on China at www.atimes.com…

leave a comment »

Shanghai, China. January 2009.

Shanghai, China. January 2009.

Helsinki- My recent article on the success of the Chinese Communist Party for the Asia Times can be read here.

Yesterday the Chinese Communist Party celebrated its 60th anniversary with a massive parade in Beijing. When rain threatened the parade, the Chinese government attempted to control the weather itself.

An excerpt from my article:

There certainly was an overwhelming amount of pomp and formality on display, but in Chinese culture, 60 is one of the most important years to commemorate. According to the New Delhi-based China expert Bhaskar Roy, “[In China, 60] marks the completion of a life cycle and the beginning of a new one.”

A Chinese friend named Jiang told me the same thing as we taxied, bussed and motorcycled around the mountains of Guangdong province this past February. “The 60th birthday is the big one. Everyone comes to celebrate your birthday at your house,” Jiang said.

The “secret” of CCP’s success perhaps lies in its ability to adapt itself to changes of politico-social environment. Indeed, 60 years of rule has also transformed the CCP itself. It is no longer a revolutionary party but tries to attract elites from all social sectors to be its members. Today, the CCP boasts 75 million members out of the country’s 1.3 billion population.

Post Updated: An excellent and expansive piece with criticisms of the CCP can be ready by clicking here.

Written by Justin Vela

October 2, 2009 at 11:14 am

Posted in Asia

Tagged with , ,

My Friend the Newest Member of the Communist Party of China…The 60th Anniversary of the CPC…Bamboo Farmers in Fengxi Forest…

leave a comment »

Fengxi, China. February 2009.

Checking into the hotel before motorcycling to the village of Fengxi, China. February 2009.

This is an unedited version of an article that appears in the October issue of New Delhi’s The Caravan magazine. The article was researched during a trip to China in January-February 2009 as part of my final studies for an undergraduate degree completed last March. While this article focuses on China’s domestic relations, I have also written about China’s foreign policy for the Asia Times.

My Friend the Newest Member of the Communist Party of China

A few weeks before we met, my friend Jiang was nominated to become a member of the Communist Party of China, the CPC.

She was ecstatic, of course. Joining the CPC was everything that she had ever wanted. She had to celebrate quietly however: the Chinese, she said, are “too reserved”. Emotion was rarely expressed in China. It might be upsetting or cause unfortunate fluxes in a society that was far too large and historically complex for its own good, Jiang said.

At least, this was what Jiang insisted to me as we taxied, motorcycled and bussed around the mountains of Guandong province this past February, seeking to examine life in rural China. Our chance introduction was evocative of the new position that China has in the world, a position of increasing internationalism and power that has strengthened subtly over many years and was now an accepted reality crashing down upon other countries and redefining the future.

I was in Maizhou, a small city in northwest Guandong, working hard at doing some serious networking. This was to say that I was in a karaoke bar drinking an immeasurable amount of watery beer with a large group of Chinese, Cameroonians, Americans, Brits and a very drunk Thai man.

As is the custom in China, the beer was being consumed in shots. Someone would yell. “Gambei!” and if you didn’t drain your glass completely, stern looks would demand you pick it back up and finish whatever was left. The night was quickly getting out of hand. One of the Americans had selected some redundant beat and was rapping into the mike, “My finger is on the button…my finger is on the button…my finger is on the button in Maizhou…” He called out the names and countries of the assembled drinkers one by one.

“…Ahmadhou is in the house… Amadhou is in the house… Cameroon is coming back… Cameroon is coming back… Zhou is in the house… Zhou is in the house… China is coming back… China is coming back… America is not coming back… America is not coming back…”

They were not the finest of lyrics, but they served to pump the American up; he was feeling good about having moved to this tiny corner of China and shaping a life for himself away from the economic crisis and mounting desperation back home. The others had also relocated, or were students who had decided that China was a better place to study in than the US or Europe. For the Cameroonians, China was an attractive place because of the investment that it was putting into Africa. As one of them told me, “I can get a degree here and learn Chinese and I will certainly be hired by one of the Chinese companies back in Africa. They like to work with people that know them.”

They were good, hardworking people and had chosen to make China the launching pad for their future successes. The problem was they were getting my translator, Crystal, far too drunk; we had to be awake enough in a few hours to go north from Maizhou up further into the mountains to the village of Fengxi, where there were bamboo farmers I wanted to interview.

Traveling without Crystal would have been impossible. Accessing the rural areas of China was difficult. You drive for hours thinking that you are getting away from the crowds and chaotic construction of the cities, but after going over hills and past rickety towns, you came to yet another expansive urban scape. China was so massive that populations of more than one million people existed tucked away in what were presumably uninhabited mountains. To get to the truly rural areas, you had to be with someone who knows where to go.

Even more difficult than getting into the rural areas was communicating with the people. Most native Chinese had a minimal knowledge of English, if any at all. Anyone who spoke Mandarin and English fluently enough to do verbal translation was a rarity. There was an additional need, in the mountains of Guandong, for a translator who spoke Hakka, a subdivision of Mandarin spoken by the Hakka people who arrived in Guandong fleeing civil wars and conflict in the Henan and Shaanxi provinces in the 17th century.

Crystal had these language skills. But she was now having far too much fun. Her parents had exiled her to Maizhou’s small, conservative university because of the time she spent hanging out in the bars and clubs in her hometown: in Maizhou she was bored. Suddenly, again among people who shared her fondness for drinking and smoking, she was dancing around and grinning madly, the bamboo farmers apparently forgotten.

A few hours later, Crystal decided she was still too drunk to move from bed, and I began scrambling for a replacement translator. A 30-minute flurry of phone calls delivered Jiang. She arrived by taxi, laughing, “Your translator got drunk. That is very funny,” she said.

She was about 24 years old and had very small teeth and straight black hair that went down past her shoulders. She did not hold eye contact for long, but instead of looking down, like most people, she looked to the side, as if thinking ahead to something.

She was also decisively not dressed for the mountains. Instead of warm clothing and appropriate shoes, she wore large wooden platforms and what looked like a designer jacket and pants. She also had a massive black Dolce & Gabbana bag that sat on her lap like some kind of large pet. “It’s all fake,” she laughed when I commented on the outfit. “None of this is actually designer. They make a lot of these kinds of copied clothes in China.”

While there was a lot about China that Jiang thought was funny, I quickly realised that she was extremely patriotic. The importance she gave to the names of the rivers that we passed and to where they flowed and what they carried made that clear. I was extremely lucky to have her as a guide. One of her friends from the university, who was originally from Fengxi, happened to be home for the weekend. She was willing to tell us about the bamboo farming.

When I asked how she spoke Hakka so well, she smiled, “I am a Hakka person.”

I felt great relief. My work would not be foiled by a night of drunken karaoke, after all.

“Jiang,” I said, “You are the perfect translator.”

On the road to Fengxi. Guandong Province, China. February 2009.

On the road to Fengxi. Guandong Province, China. February 2009.

I was travelling in China at the appropriate time: 2009 was, after all, shaping up to be a big year for the country. There was the 50th anniversary of the March Tibetan Uprising. June marked the Tiananmen Square massacre. And, in October, the People’s Republic of China turns 60.

More important than all the anniversaries, however, was China’s undeniable rise in prosperity and power. Hillary Clinton had just visited China, the most important stop in her first trip abroad as secretary of state. She had spoken of the US and China on terms that some perceived as nearly equal.

“We have every reason to believe that the United States and China will recover and that together we will help lead the world to recover,” Clinton said, referring to the global financial crisis, at a news conference with Yang Jiechi, China’s foreign minister.

I had arrived in China for the first time a month before, flying into Shanghai from Helsinki. Even though I had grown accustomed to the advanced prosperity of the Nordic countries, China immediately awed me with its vast momentum and drive, which was being felt everywhere, and by dozens of people, Chinese and foreigners alike, who spoke proudly of the possibilities that existed for those wild and devious enough to succeed at them.

“There is this immediate sense that you can do here,” said Aimee Hayes. The 26-year-old founder of Bean Shanghai, a non-profit that organised volunteering events and networking nights, sat in one of Shanghai’s countless Starbucks, slowly pulling apart a blueberry muffin. “So many people in other places are always negative,” she said. “For whatever reason, they feel that they cannot be successful. Here in China, people are talking positively. Here they feel the ability to be successful.”

Ability. This is the word I heard repeated again and again in Shanghai at the beginning of 2009. And it wasn’t just a sentiment felt by the thousands of foreigners who lived and worked in the city.

In an expensive restaurant along East Nanjing Road, Terry Wu, a 32-year-old from Yunan province, joined a group of friends for lunch. Like the majority of people in China’s cities, Wu had come to Shanghai looking for employment after graduating from university. He now worked for a financial company doing research for US firms. Despite the global economic crisis, he was optimistic about China becoming one of the world’s new economic centres.

“We are among the few countries with growth projected for 2009. It is not as much growth as we had hoped, but it is still more growth than most other countries,” he said.

Speaking of the differences between what it was like to live in China when he was young and what it is like now, he said that when he was young his family could only afford to eat very simply, without a large variety of food. He was in high school before he knew what a beeper was. Growing up, there was no television in his house.

Now he had enough money to eat whatever food he wanted. He had a TV and an i-Phone, and had recently purchased an expensive apartment. Although the economic crisis was expected to worsen – one Chinese businessman I interviewed said, “China has not seen the real winter yet” – Wu saw the results of a changing China all around him in the form of Shanghai’s tall buildings, shopping malls, a fast subway system, and access to products that only a few years ago would have been unavailable.

Most Chinese people I spoke with in cities believed that the country would not only continue to develop in a way that would bring consistent improvement to their lives but also that it would open up more as time passed. Their increasing ‘ability’ – which some argued was a form of democracy – made them tolerate the government’s often heavy-handed tactics and autocratic behaviour.

“China is too big,” Wu said. “It is impossible to take into account everyone’s opinions. It is better that the leaders make the decisions.”

East Nanjing Road in Shanghai, China.

East Nanjing Road in Shanghai, China.

Not many wanted to speak about the “throw up and tear down” nature of Chinese development and the often poor standards. A laowai, a foreigner, criticising China was not welcome. The conviction that after 5,000 years of existence, theirs is the greatest of cultures, made many Chinese seem somewhat arrogant. As one of the Cameroonians said to me, “This country’s biggest problem is that the people think they are better than everyone else.”

Regardless, China was transforming the world around it, and the methods it has used to achieve its current status were often overlooked in favour of what currently exists on the ground. This, many said, was more important than anything that happened in the past.

This was an opinion that Jiang most likely shared. I decided not to ask too much about her political beliefs so early in our journey however. If the people in the cities were so optimistic, I was curious to know how the people in the countryside felt. Speaking to them with Jiang’s help would make sense of a crucial fact about the new China: that the priorities and the chief audience of the government were different than in the past. China was no longer a place of a messy revolution and class struggle. The people had changed. Jiang, in her faux designer clothes, embodied that change.

As we drove out of Maizhou and deeper into the mountains, I looked across the landscape. The hills had large craters where the ground had been detonated loose and packed in barges to be brought downriver and used in building projects. Along the highway, mounds of coal from Fujian province were protected by rickety wooden shelters. The highway itself was cracked and messily potholed.

After about two hours of driving, we turned off the highway and began to gradually climb a curvy, recently-laid concrete road. The taxi driver took the turns at speed, honking to warn incoming cars of our ascent. A roadside hotel 20 minutes up the mountain was as far as he would go. We surprised the hotel’s single employee, who, with no guests to look after, was in the process of locking the front door to go home for the weekend.

She sighed, unlocked the door and led the way to rooms on the third floor. “You are free to make your own lunch,” she said, handing over the keys and disappearing. Jiang thought this was typical and very amusing. “There are never any guests, but she still wants her day off. There is nothing valuable in this hotel and we have it all to ourselves,” she said.

She went through the kitchen trying to scavenge up something to eat. All she found was a little rice and some vegetables that she prepared with oil in a wok.

“I am not a good cook,” she said. “My father is a good cook, but I am not.”

Cell phone service was weak on the mountain. Jiang kept trying to reach her friend in Fengxi; the village was further up the road, too far for us to reach on foot. I guessed that since her father cooked, she came from a fairly progressive family. While she did not disagree, she insisted her family was “typical Chinese.” Finally, after lunch, the call went through and motorcycles were dispatched from Fengxi to pick us up.

While we waited I told Jiang that I had attended an English class at the university in Maizhou and had been surprised that the exercises in the textbooks had brought up the issue of inequality between men and women in Chinese society. These exercises, while designed for practicing English, served the dual purpose of encouraging students to think of women in business as being equal to men, and for men not to take for granted the work that women did.

Jiang said she was familiar with the textbook exercises. They were one of the ways that the Chinese government was trying to transform the country, she said. She then asked me how common domestic violence was outside China, where she said it was quite widespread.

Caught off-guard with this large and rather complicated question, I did not have time to ask Jiang exactly what the government was trying to transform China into. Our conversation on social equality was cut short by the arrival of two motorcycles that would transport us up the mountain to Fengxi. My driver, a large woman with short black hair, quickly took the lead. The road, empty of people and vehicles, was very smooth. The absence of potholes, which plague the majority of roads in China, meant that this road was very new. The road was flanked with bamboo trees and small bushes.

Half an hour, later the road ended at Fengxi. As we drove into the small square in the centre of the village, a group of older women and a few children turned around and stared at me in surprise. I was a foreigner in a village that had few Chinese visitors. But then I noticed that they were also staring at Jiang. In her ‘designer’ clothes, she was almost as much a foreigner as I.

“There are only old and young people here because everyone else has gone to work in the factories along the coast,” Jiang whispered to me.

Her friend Xui Li appeared from inside a house. They threw their arms around each other and giggled together for a few minutes. Xui Li, was shorter than Jiang and wore glasses, a pink sweater and jeans. She was an English teacher in a town an hour and half from Fengxi and was home for the weekend visiting her parents.

Although they looked very different, Xui Li quickly asserted herself as just as proud of China as Jiang. She described Fengxi as having 200 inhabitants who lived happily in the forest, which was known for herbs and plants used in Chinese medicine. Her enthusiasm to educate me on the greatness of rural life was difficult to disengage from. It was after some trying that I interjected that it would be nice to walk through Fengxi and see the bamboo forest.

Xui Li nodded and turned around and began a march through Fengxi. It didn’t take long. The village was tiny. The houses were made of mud bricks and wood, and all appeared drafty. Chickens, goats and ducks meandered around the front yards.

Xui Li explained that the government gave the residents of Fengxi a small yearly subsidy, but otherwise their only income came from farming bamboo. Every family had its own section of the forest to cultivate and cut bamboo from. Every family also had two or three parcels of land of about one Mao each on which they grew vegetables and rice. There were so many vegetable and rice farmers in China that not all the crops could be sold in the market, and people in Fengxi preferred to eat what they grew.

These tiered plots of farmland lay at the edge of the village. Separated by long lines of mud mixed with hay that prevented them from being washed away during the rainy season, the land was currently not being used because the cold made it difficult to grow food.

The government had given the land to the residents of Fengxi in 1978, the year China officially began economic reforms. Although the state technically owns the land, it allowed the farmers to use the land without paying rent and to do whatever they pleased with what they produced.

The land, both the rice and vegetable plots and the sections of bamboo forest, belonged to the villages in all but name. This was a huge departure from the hardline communist policies that existed a generation ago. Then, the CPC-led government would never have allowed something so similar to private ownership for the peasants.

Such a departure had come from an acknowledgement by China’s leaders that the policies of the Cultural Revolution and Great Leap Forward had been, if not complete failures, not suitable enough to meet the needs of the country’s massive population growth. When Mao Zedong’s death brought to power more realistic leaders, it was the fact that China was facing mass famines and impending popular unrest that forced the change in policies that made the country what it is today: among other things, it had permitted the farmers greater control of their lives.

The bamboo forest began at the edge of the rice and vegetable plots. It was dense and continued to the top of the mountain. The bamboo trees were tall and as thick around as two wrists. They were so numerous that the forest took on a dark green hue.

Depending on how much bamboo it grew on its section, each family could earn between two hundred and one thousand yuan per year. The bamboo was sold only once a year, in March, when construction companies sent trucks to Fengxi and bought the bamboo to use as scaffoldings for China’s many construction projects.

There were also some thin pine trees in the forest. Trying to avoid soil erosion, the government had banned the villagers from cutting them down, but, said Xui Li, the construction companies pay one hundred yuan for each pine tree and only twenty yuan for each bamboo tree. The pine trees had more uses, and they were often cut down and secretly sold to the construction companies. Despite repeated warnings from the government, soil erosion was not the villagers’ primary concern.

Xui Li led the way to her family’s section of the bamboo forest. Each family’s section was marked off with older bamboo trees with red symbols painted on them or large rocks or other natural formations. The section that belonged to Xui Li’s family stretched from a small river to the edge of the trail to a cluster of two older bamboo trees and a pine. I noticed that most of the bamboo trees in her family’s section were older than the rest. When I asked about this, she smiled and started walking back down the trail to Fengxi.

Xui Li’s job teaching English had made it possible for her parents to no longer have to farm the bamboo. The first woman from Fengxi to graduate from university – in fact, only the third person in the village to ever attend – Xui Li earned two thousand yuan a month working as an English teacher at a small school down the mountain from Fengxi. Her chief monthly expense was an extensive insurance package which she had purchased as soon as she had received her first paycheque. After paying that, she gave five hundred yuan a month to her parents, spending what was left over on food, clothes and paying the truck driver who brought her home to visit her parents every weekend. She even saved money to occasionally take trips to Fujian and Hubein provinces.

“I am a new teacher,” she said. “I teach children the basics of English – colours, objects and the alphabet. That is why my English is not very good. When I’m done working, I go to my room or window shop online. It is a little boring.”

“But there are many handsome men that are interested in you,” Jiang teased her.

“Yes, but I do not want to get married yet. I will get married at 28. Now I am 25,” Jiang said. “I am a very important person in my family. I want to stay a very important person, so I want to be able to make money. My husband will cherish me more.”

The girl had a particularly obvious case of the ‘little princess syndrome’, a social condition that had gripped the maturing generation in China and caused some concern that they will prove themselves too spoiled and revered to run China with the same effectiveness of their elders. Meeting Xui Li, I understood how it had happened. The generation of Chinese in their 20s had been made to feel that they were the most important part of their household by their parents, who were poor and struggling. The youth were their parents’ only chance of escaping poverty, and so they were encouraged to feel they were special in order for them to achieve as much as possible.

Xui Li described how after she was born her father left Fengxi to work in a factory along the coast. He worked in factories for 12 years to save the money necessary to send Xui Li to university.

“He told me that he was doing it for me,” Xui Li said. “My father was sacrificed for my future, and now I must pay him back and take care of my parents as they get older.”

Xui Li’s father, Zhang, joined us for the walk through the bamboo forest. Thin and lithe, he had had corroding black teeth, but a bright, charismatic smile. When I asked him how productive the bamboo farming had been for Fengxi, he said, “It depends on the government how much we earn.”

He took us further up the mountain to where two villagers were cutting bamboo trees. On the way, we passed an older couple who were carrying bushels of bamboo on their backs. They were at least in their 70s. “They do not have any children. That is why they still have to work,” Jiang said.

Fengxi, China. February 2009

Fengxi, China. February 2009

Two villagers who were cutting the bamboo stopped when we approached. There was a long stream of cut bamboo trees cascading down the side of the mountain to where the older couple picked them up and brought them to storage shelters near Fengxi’s entrance.

The villagers claimed that they could cut 3,000 kg of bamboo a day, working for six hours. Wanting to demonstrate his own bamboo-cutting abilities, Zhang took a curved knife in a white sheath hanging from a tree, strapped the sheath around his waist with the knife at the small of his back, and approached a bamboo tree.

In less than a minute, he cut down the tree with short deliberate hacks, quickly sheathing the knife and lifting the tree off its stump when it began to teeter, controlling its descent by running along with it till it fell.

He then began cutting off the thin branches with quick, hard cuts. Done with this, he pushed the tree with his foot and sent it onto a large pile that was going down the side of the mountain.

Zhang was proud that his daughter had graduated university and immediately had found a job. He had lived in the factory worker’s dormitories and had rarely taken a vacation in order to save 1,000 yuan a month to pay for Xui Li’s education. “I worked hard to send my daughter to university,” he said. “It was also my own self-preservation.”

The initial years of investment had paid off well. He was now living the dream of the Chinese farmer. With his daughter’s salary taking care of his basic living expenses, he and his wife had been able to retire. Most of Zhang’s days were now spent drinking tea outside his home, which was one of the nicest and best maintained in the village.

It had a dining room, a kitchen and three bedrooms. In the kitchen, there was a wood-burning stove used to boil water, and a small gas stove. Xui Li said that gas stoves had arrived in Fengxi in 1992. One container of gas sometimes had to last a family an entire year.

Water was piped into their home from off the mountain. A single faucet let the water out into a bucket. Xui Li claimed that the water was clean enough to drink without boiling, but all the same I declined when she offered me a glass.

Over tea, I asked Zhang what he thought were the main differences between his generation and his daughters’? Were the reforms that China began 20 years ago felt in the villages?

He nodded. Even in villages as remote as Fengxi, the reforms had been felt. Most importantly, the reforms had given the farmers a sense of ownership and responsibility for the land. While they still earned little or no money from it, having control of the land ensured that no one went hungry. They still could not afford to pay for a hospital when they were sick or go far from Fengxi, but Zhang said that simply being fed was an improvement great enough that he was satisfied with what had happened in China in recent years.

“We have freedom now in China,” he said. “I am living better than my father lived. China is becoming stronger. I am proud of that.”

Dabu, China. February 2009.

Dabu, China. February 2009.

Jiang was considering the world around her again.

“I see American movies and am very curious about the relationships,” she said.

We were back at the hotel sitting on padded chairs and flipping through uninteresting television channels. Jiang was making comments about the passing scenes, which at this hour of night tended to be romantic. She said that the kind of relationships presented in Western movies were not frequent in China. She was 24 but had only had one boyfriend. When they had spent time together, they went on walks and she had “never done anything with him”.

This fact did not particularly seem to bother her. The romance she saw in Western movies was interesting, she said, but not something she necessarily wanted for herself. Like her friend Xui Li, she was focused on establishing herself with a good career before going onto marriage, or any kind of romantic relationship. She was not even very sure that there actually was romance in marriage. She desired only a functionality that would allow her to be independent of a partner, but at the same time provide her with some kind of companionship.

This was a very modern and thought-out view on romance and a career. She acknowledged being more ambitious than many of her peers, but saw nothing radical in her demands. She thought her ideas were very appropriate and practical.

As she guided me around Fengxi, I realised that Jiang was part of the new intelligentsia that was coming into being in China. It was a group of people who had in the last few years become part of the growing middle class, and saw nothing wrong with wealth and intellectualism, the very things that had been so derided during the Cultural Revolution.

How much the class divide had changed in China had been illustrated earlier in the evening when Jiang and I went for a walk.

Zhang had arranged for us to be motorcycled back to the hotel. After letting ourselves in, we realised that it was still relatively early and walked down the road to see if there was anything open. There wasn’t. The single store was dark. Soft music floated from a house next to the hotel, but otherwise the only signs of life were a middle-aged woman and her son who were squatting under a street lamp past the store.

The woman told us that they were out on the street because her elder son was in the middle of a violent fit. They had left him alone in the house while waiting for him to stop. The periodic fits had started a few months before when a schoolteacher gave him the news that his father had been killed in a car accident. The teacher apparently hadn’t been particularly sensitive while breaking the news, and the woman’s son had been traumatized.

When I asked where they were originally from, the woman gestured at the other side of the mountain. She had land there in a small village of seven families, but the government had recently decided that the village was too far from other towns or cities and brought them to live in the area around the hotel. The woman hadn’t wanted to move, but she had been given no choice. A house had been provided for her and she worked as a day labourer, cutting bamboo, doing laundry or cooking for whoever would hire her.

She didn’t make enough money to take her son who suffered the violent fits to a doctor but, like the villagers in Fengxi, she earned enough money to eat. Any hopes of elevating herself out of poverty, as Zhang had done, were gone. Because of the violent fits, university was impossible for her older son; her younger son, who was with her under the street light, had recently failed the entrance exam. All hopes of her children saving her were gone.

As we walked off, Jiang said, “I think those are the poorest people I have ever met.”

This was too much of a juxtaposition to go unobserved. Jiang had just joined the CPC. Founded as the “party of the people,” the CPC had originally been composed of peasants, the people who believed in Mao’s promises of uprising and class struggle – people who had perhaps been very similar to the peasant woman we had just spoken to.

Although she had been born in a village, Jiang had been raised in enough wealth that she had never met the poorest of these peasants. She was decisively not one of them. Her modern views and sense of style made her far more cosmopolitan than anyone who had joined the Red Guards during the 1960s and 1970s.

The day after we visited Fengxi, we visited her parents in the town of Dabu. Her father’s cooking was indeed excellent, the family apartment spacious. Although they were suspicious, neither parent outright objected to Jiang travelling alone with a man and welcomed me in their home.

After lunch with her parents we went to a park in the middle of Dabu to wait for a taxi back to Maizhou. Along the way, we saw a scene that was widely prevalent in China: a woman working farmland framed by traditional houses backed by large apartment and office buildings in the process of being constructed. As cities in China swelled, they seemed to overtake the countryside. The people without the money to move into the more modern buildings continued to live in their ramshackle homes and farms surrounded by skyscrapers.

We sat in the park, which had only recently been constructed. I wanted to ask Jiang why, exactly, she had decided to join the CPC – something that seemed to take an effort – and what she hoped to gain from it.

A mischievous smile on her face, Jiang was surprisingly candid. Joining the CPC meant that she had a chance to escape a fate that she deplored: teaching primary school children basic English in one of Guandong’s small towns.

What she wanted was to live in Shenzhen, China’s famous special economic zone and the most developed city in Guangdong, and work as either a teacher or in business. Failing that, she wanted to work for the local government in Maizhou, the city where she attended university. To get either job, it was necessary to be a party member.

“That is the first step,” Jiang said. “Next, you need connections. It is best if you have a family member who has a power position. That is how most people get good jobs. If you don’t know someone, you have to pay for the connections. For a job in Shenzhen, maybe you have to pay a lot, but it is a good investment. Your starting salary is also a lot. There are bonuses and the salary is quickly raised.”

Just as the countryside in China had changed itself from being a place of food shortages and ceaseless difficulties, China’s infamous Communist Party had also transformed itself. It was becoming attractive to people such as Jiang, people who were exposed to other cultures and saw the CPC as a way to elevate their social position.

“If you are a party member and work in business, it is a way to smooth promotions. If you work in politics, it is a way to move up,” said Prof Srikant Kondapally of Jawaharlal Nehru University in New Delhi. “The reason why the CPC is still strong within China is that it has adapted to the evolving situation in the country. The CPC originally claimed to represent the broad masses, but has shifted from representing the working class, as it did under Mao, to now also representing the rising middle class, the capitalist class. The CPC now appeals to everyone. This one change was crucial.”

Kondapally went on to say that the CPC was the chief representation of the “advanced production forces”, the people who work in business and industry, the exporters and entrepreneurs. An estimated 20 million private entrepreneurs have joined the CPC in recent years.

The party’s overall goal had shifted from class revolution to reviving China to a place of greatness on par with where it was during its “Middle Kingdom” period, when it was the largest and most powerful force in Asia. This thinking, Kondapally said, was a by-product of China’s desire for Great Power status. China had waited for centuries, but it was now emerging again as a powerful nation. And the CPC, the government, had the full backing of the Chinese people, who – despite their frustrations with the effects of the global financial crisis – are aware of the improvements that have come to their country in a relatively short time.

Rural China. February 2009.

Rural China. February 2009.

A few days later Jiang came to visit me in Shenzhen. We ate a noodle lunch and walked through one of the city’s many malls. Jiang peered inside each of the stores on all three levels, sprayed me with perfume, and described the products as overwhelming and wonderful. She was wearing Capri jeans and a loose silky blouse and sandals with massive stiletto heels. In Shenzhen, she fit in.

The last time Jiang was in Shenzhen, she had been working for the summer in a factory, putting price tags on items and checking the colour quality of stickers. She worked 10 hours a day and made decent money, but neither a job in a factory or as an English teacher in a small town would satisfy her. She wanted more.

And the CPC, she felt, could give her that. She lowered her voice and chose her words when talking about the party. “I thought it would be a good idea to join,” she said. “Maybe I think joining gives me some kind of status. I don’t know. They haven’t done anything for me yet. I really don’t think it is so different from your country. Without a lot of contacts, you cannot do anything.”

She had first joined the CPC’s youth wing. Then, after several exams and interviews, she was nominated to join the party. The final question at the last interview was, simply, “Why do you want to join the Communist Party?”

“I told them it was my patriotic duty,” Jiang said. She bowed her head and grinned. “Actually I don’t know. I want to control relationships between people. I want a good job. Also, if I get a job with the local government, there is not very much to do. There is much time for relaxing.”

I ask her if she knew what happened at Tiananmen Square in 1989.

“Tiananmen Square? I know something bad happened. I do not know exactly what. Something bad happened with the government. I do not want to know. Some good things happen and some bad things happen. I only want to know the good things. I let everything else go through my head.”

This was a new China. It was still struggling, going through massive domestic changes, but the energy and confidence felt by the people was real.

The global financial crisis has made it necessary that China lessen its reliance on exporting products to the US and Europe and focus more on domestic consumption. This focus on the domestic market is a strategy that has already allowed India, the other Asian giant, to rapidly develop, although it has not been able to do so as rapidly or with such statistical impressiveness as China.

My intention had been to see the changing China from the ground. Of the world I had travelled thus far, Chinese peasants had been the most positive and expressed the most optimism in their future. China was also one of the few places in the world where an originally repressive and violent political party was transforming into a new entity, slowly adapting to the global reality.

The story of China’s growth to Great Power status is still evolving. There are many variables. The CPC still does not allow heavy dissent, as shown by the recent demonstrations by Uighurs in Xinjiang province. The CPC has shown the power and willingness to shut down large parts of the country. But if China continues to liberalize, how long can the CPC expect to maintain power? Will the CPC eventually allow itself to fade?

In Shenzhen, Jiang grinned at me. “You must come back here,” she said. “No one in China knows what will happen next.”

Chinese New Year Celebrations at Jiming Temple in Nanjing, China.

Chinese New Year Celebrations at Jiming Temple in Nanjing, China.

Homes destroyed by the local government in Nanjing, China that will be replaced by buildings similar to those in the background.

Homes destroyed by the local government in Nanjing, China that will be replaced by buildings similar to those in the background.

Written by Justin Vela

September 22, 2009 at 9:12 pm

Posted in Asia

Tagged with , , , , ,

Nepal’s Smoldering Terai

with one comment

Bullet and tear casings fired at the Tharu protesters by Nepali police as they unsuccessfully tried to end the Tharu's bandha in Chitwan.

Bullet and tear casings fired at the Tharu protesters by Nepali police as they unsuccessfully tried to end the Tharu's bandha in Chitwan. copyright 2009 Justin Vela.

Helsinki-Below is an unedited version of an article on the growing tension in Nepal’s Terai region. This article was written last March/April for The Caravan magazine.

For additional information read this excellant article in The National which profiles a different Madhesi group. While I doubt the Madhesi will follow through with their threat to carry out suicide attacks this conflict does appear to be growing. I also question the different Madhesi armed groups ability to unite into a large insurgency. Each one claims they are about to carry out attacks, but they are not speaking with a single voice. I hope to be back in the Terai to continue working on this story early next year.

Nepal’s Smoldering Terai
Justin Vela

Growing Ethnic Tension As Nepal Writes It’s New Constitution Makes Peace Look Far Away

When we meet in the town of Mortiya, which lies not far from the Indian border in Nepal’s southern Terai reigon, Ranjit Khadka immediately leads the way to the back corner of a dark canteen and speaks with his voice lowered in case he is overheard.

“They told me, ‘This is our region. You don’t have the right to be here,’” Khadka says.
Two years ago, at about nine o’clock at night, Khadka was inside his house watching the news when men dressed in blue camouflage broke into his home. He told them that they didn’t have permission to be there, but a gun was put to his head and he was made to walk blindfolded for several hours through cornfields until coming to a house where the blindfold was removed in a dark room.

Khadka had been kidnapped by Janatantrik Terai Mukti Morcha (JTMM), one of thirty-four armed organizations founded by members of the Madhesi indigenous group who claim to be fighting for Madhesi rights and an autonomous state in the Terai. This was 2007 and the Madhesi, both the armed organizations which were then just forming and the common people, were in the throes of several weeks of violence that came to be known in Nepal as the Madhesi Uprising.

Khadka was freed after his friends paid JTMM a ransom of 500,000 Nepalese rubies. The Madhesi Uprising continued until the newly elected Maoist government agreed to rename the Terai the Madhes and have Nepal’s interim constitution amended to say that the future constitution, which is due to be completed in May 2010, will turn Nepal into a country composed of federal states.

As Khadka was being released his captors told him. “You have to read our history. We blame you because you are Pahadi. That is your crime.” Khadka was stunned. A Pahadi or “hill person,” Khadka’s family came to the Terai two generations ago from the Kathmandu Valley, buying land and working as farmers. Until 2007 there was no noticeable ethnic tension between the Pahadis and the local indigenous people. Since the Madhesi Uprising however he and other Pahadis have started being intimidated into fleeing the Terai, which the different indigenous groups are reclaiming as their own. There are near daily killings and nearly all Pahadis have left the southern Terai. “I am one of the few Pahadis still living in Mortiya,” Khadka says. “Eight-five percent of my friends are Madhesi, but I still don’t feel safe living here.”

Santoshi Shresthei was shot in the thigh by a ricochet bullet as the police unsuccessfully used force to end the Tharu's bandha in Chitwan.

Santoshi Shresthei was shot in the thigh by a ricochet bullet as the police unsuccessfully used force to end the Tharu's bandha in Chitwan. image copyright 2009 Justin Vela

Democracy, it has consistently been proven, is a messy form of rule. And it is the initial stages that are the most dangerous for any newly established democratic country. Though many hoped that the ending of the ten year civil war would usher a new era of stability into Nepal, it appears that the country is only headed towards additional conflict, this time led by the indigenous people who are using any means necessary to get rights to land and representation for their own particular group written into the new constitution.

“I very much feel that Nepal is headed to more conflict,” says Tilak Pokharel, a Nepali journalist for the newspaper My Republica. “Given the present circumstances I think there will be straight anarchy. All five main political parties need to come together now with one message otherwise I can’t say where it will start.”

This is a sentiment echoed by other journalists and intellectuals I interview in Kathmandu. Indeed some even support the indigenous groups using force. “Some of them will waste their struggle in parliament. Some of us may take up arms like the Maoists did. The same as in any democratic country,” says C.K. Lal, a well known political commentator.

The Madhesi are not the only indigenous group using force to secure rights in the new constitution. In the village of Bachheuli, in the central Terai district of Chitwan, a Tharu man named Sanjit Mahato says, “We Tharus are the Dharti Putra, the sons of the soil. My family has lived in this village for six generations. Before that the Tharu people moved across the Terai whenever they needed to find more fertile land. We have always lived in the Terai.”

Mahato, a large man with a drooping black mustache and hands that are hard and cracked from a lifetime of farming, is sitting on a wooden bench in the shade of a single story wooden house. Behind the house water buffalo pull carts towards rice paddies. The Tharus claim to being the original inhabitants of the Terai is not something that the government contests. However, succumbing further to Madhesi demands, the government added them to the Madhesi population, failing to acknowledge them as separate group in the interim constitution.

Due to the slow way that information travels from the government to the people in Nepal, it was only earlier this year that the Tharus discovered that their hope for proportional representation based on the population size of each indigenous group had been shattered and the Terai renamed the Madhes. Enraged, they sent a delegation to Kathmandu seeking recognition as a distinct group and to restore the name Terai to the constitution. The delegation was ignored. Out of a fear that their culture would gradually be lost and that they would not have the representation and access to jobs that they deserved, the different Tharu organizations in the Terai joined together under the umbrella of the Tharu Welfare Society and declared a massive bandha or strike that shut down the Mahendra highway that runs across the Terai – Nepal’s breadbasket – and caused massive gasoline and food shortages across the country.

Mahato was among the thousands of Tharus who took part in the bandha. He enthusiastically describes Tharus coming from villages all over the Terai to lay barricades across various points along the highway. Schools were closed so children could take part in the bandha. The bright purples, blues, and reds of the Tharu women’s saris gave the bandha a festive air. Not even the tourist busses that are so vital to Nepal’s economy were allowed to pass as the Tharus blocked the highway chanting slogans such as, “We are not Madhesi. Government cannot make us” and “Madhes should be Terai. All should be in unity.”

After four days of the bandha members of the Armed Police Force gathered along the highway in Chitwan and attempted to disperse the Tharus as they were preparing dinner, firing rubber bullets and tear gas. The Tharus scattered, but when they refused to leave the highway the police began firing live rounds at close range. Twenty-four Tharus were wounded and two killed; one man bleeding to death when the police stopped the ambulance that had been called for him.

The injured were collected and taken to the hospital on foot or in wagons pulled by tractors. Apparently seeking to frighten the Tharus into ending their bandha, police arrived at the hospital and used bayonets to attack the people who had transported the wounded, cutting several men across the tops of their heads. The Tharus had declared from the start that they would remain peaceful, but once they realized the kind of tactics the police were using they picked up rocks and began throwing them at the police, their superior number forcing them to retreat.

The next day the bandha continued in full force. Groups of Tharus came from up to forty kilometers away, filling the roads alongside the highway. When they began chanting slogans the police again attacked. They broke doors and windows and entered houses as they chased the Tharus through the streets, beating entire families inside their homes. Two policemen who became separated from the rest were attacked on a side street. One was killed with an ax. The other was wounded, but escaped.

“I was surprised by the police reaction,” Mahato says. “They came in a big group and suddenly attacked us.” Despite the deaths and injuries he feels that the bandha was justified. “I was very angry when I heard that the government sees us as Madhesi. We are Tharu. We are not Madhesi. The Madhesi want to take Tharu land and make it theirs. We are against that.”

Thirteen days after the Tharus began their bandha, the government proposed a six-point agreement which promised to amend the interim constitution to recognize them as separate from the Madhesi, refer to the Terai as the Terai/Madhes as opposed to simply the Madhes, and give compensation to the families of the people killed by the police during the bandha.

“Our bandha proved itself to be successful,” Mahato says. Though he feels that the bandha made the government take the Tharus’ demands seriously he does not trust the government to actually implement the agreement. The Madhesis have a larger voice in Nepal’s constituent assembly and thirty-four armed groups who, along with demanding greater rights and representation, insist that at least a part of the Terai keep the name Madhes and want the Tharus to remain recognized as Madhesis so that the Madhesi can have greater representation based on a larger population size.

The Madhesi’s demands, Mahato vows, will not be achieved. “There will be more struggle,” he says. “This bandha was the first step. We have to wait and see what the government will do with the constitution.”

Though he initially hoped that the Maoists would change Nepal for the best, Mahato sees them as a disappointment to the indigenous people. “They have not done anything,” he says. “People are still dying every day. The security situation is so bad that people go off and you are not sure if they are going to come back. There is no real peace.”

While the Tharus are committed to peace, Mahato says,they will not relinquish their demands for equal rights and will not allow themselves to be labeled as Madhesi.

“With this thirteen day bandha the Tharus were taken seriously,” he says. “The new constitution will be proposed next May. If the government does not meet our demands the bandhas can go on for thirteen months or thirteen years. However long it takes.”

A Tharu man uses a water pump to irrigate a field in the Chitwan district. The Terai has been suffering a drought and crop production has dropped in some areas by as much as 40 percent.

A Tharu man uses a water pump to irrigate a field in the Chitwan district. The Terai has been suffering a drought and crop production has dropped in some areas by as much as 40 percent. image copyright 2009 Justin Vela

The Terai is Nepal’s most agriculturally fertile region, yet traveling across it the land is mostly dry and inhospitable. There are fields and some forests, but moving east the earth becomes more barren and river beds are empty or low. Many of the bridges over these drought inflicted rivers are guarded by the Nepali Army; improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs) are still occasionally hidden in the deep cracks of these bridges, reminders of the contrived nature of peace in Nepal.

While he believes violence to be natural to a post-revolutionary, newly democratic country, C.K. Lal says, “My feeling is that it will not be so intense. They will take up guns, but Nepal has learned from the mistakes of India. We have a strong vanguard of intelligentsia. They are acting responsibly. There will be violence, but it will not tear Nepal apart.”

With armed struggle always an option, the Tharus and many other groups in Nepal have for now chosen bandhas, the non-violent weapon of choice in Nepal as a method of agitation. Effective because Nepal is reliant upon most of its basic products coming through the Terai from India, when the highway is blocked the rest of the country is choked. If the people orchestrating the bandha can withstand the police, the government often concedes to their demands.

It is traveling the Mahrendra highway east from the majority Tharu areas that I have my first encounter with a bandha. Trucks and cars are stopped ahead. The driver gets into the right lane and speeds along a line of vehicles that stretches for kilometers. Drivers lie in the shade beneath cargo trucks. Others stand or sit on the side of the road. Some sleep inside their cars. Everyone seems resigned to not moving.This bandha has nothing to do with indigenous rights; Nepal Oil Corporation employees have taken to the highway after it was announced that older petrol trucks would be fazed out and their owners forced to purchase new ones, something they do not feel they are paid enough to do.

Unsure if we will be let through, the driver asks around for someone selling petrol. A woman points to a barn where she fills a plastic bucket with petrol that is funneled into the car. There are many large plastic bottles in the barn; bandhas are so frequent on this part of the highway that the woman has prepared in advance. The frequency of bandhas has made the Nepalese sympathize with each other. When drivers are stuck for days and run out of money to buy food, someone in the surrounding houses usually appears with a large platter of rice to share. Other times drivers are forced to sell jewelry or the products that they are transporting simply to eat.

When we attempt to negotiate our way through the bandha, multiple groups of tense men rush at the car yelling for the driver to to turn around. In the car there is an elderly woman who is returning home after receiving treatment at a hospital in Chitwan. The driver argues that she must return home and rest. The men look through her medical papers suspiciously before agreeing to let the car pass. On the other side of the Nepal Oil Corporation trucks that have been parked horizontally across the highway there are kilometers more of stopped vehicles, their discontent drivers moping around the edges of the highway.

While the Tharus express a commitment to non-violence, the Madhesi, who are the dominant indigenous group in the eastern Terai, have already become far more contentious and the highway has become the dividing line between the majority Madhesi areas and the ethnically mixed parts of the eastern Terai. Since the Madhesi Uprising in 2007, Pahadi people and many Tharus have been intimidated and threatened to the extent that most of the towns and villages along the border with India have become nearly entirely Madhesi as other groups increasingly moving north of the highway.

How much support the armed organizations actually have is difficult to gauge. They extort, kidnap, and kill not only Pahadis but also their fellow Madhesis for donations, urging them to unify as Madhesi people. “Not all of the organizations have a real desire for political power. Some do,” one Madhesi man told me. While most of the armed Madhesi organizations use political claims to excuse what is essentially organized crime, the larger ones do appear to have found some local support by making promises of land redistribution to Madhesi villagers, something that the Maoists have failed to accomplish.

After several days of waiting, one of these groups, the Terai Liberation Front (TLF), which is known locally by the name Rajan, agrees to meet with me. They are currently holding negotiations with the government and when a jeep filled with their top commanders arrives along the edge of the highway, they are met not only by a group of their local men, but also a police truck. The police explain that they have been ordered to provide security to the TLF as a courtesy extended by the government. Their primary task is to protect the leaders from the local Pahadi people who burned a TLF van two months before when it drove through a bandha demanding donations.

The jeep transporting the TLF commanders attempts to drive down the gravel road leading south of the highway, but runs out of gas after only a few meters. It is the police who then decide to drive them the several kilometers to the village of Karmuhan, which has dozens of small red TLF flags hanging from trees and homes.

Bicycles, a few water pumps, and a scattering of cars and motorcycles are some of the minimal changes that have come to Karmuhan in centuries. The basic farming techniques and thatched roof houses have long remained the same. Closely watched by the local villagers,the TLF commanders lay out sheets on the second story of a wooden community center that they are constructing on land “captured” from a Pahadi man after he succumbed to their threats and left the village. “He was going to sell this land,” one of the commanders says. “It should be used by local people.”

Rajir Utkarsh is one of the commanders taking part in the negotiations with the government. A goateed man dressed in a yellow collared shirt and black dress pants he says, “We want to make the people of the Terai free. They have never had a chance to be free until now.”

The TLF believe the eastern Terai to be part of the Madhes, a region that they claim is half in India and half in Nepal. This is something that no experts in Kathmandu can verify. The Madhesi came to Nepal from Ganges river valley in India and “Madhes” derives from the Nepali word “Madhyadesh” which means “central nation.” While the Tharus are demanding the Terai remain a single region, the TLF and most of the other Madhesi groups want either independence or a highly autonomous state that will be linked with India through the open border between the two countries, with no Nepali police or army.

Though their view of history appears to be unsubstantiated, the TLF’s profess to be defenders of the indigenous groups. “The Madhesi people are like slaves without the rights of citizens,” Utkarsh says. “There are many qualified people, but the government never uses us. So we are compelled to raise our weapons.”

Utkarsh has no expectations concerning the negotiations with the government and claims that the TLF is using the negotiation period to train soldiers and plan attacks on police stations. We walk to another piece of land that Utkarsh says was also recently captured by the TLF from a Pahadi landowner.

“We are distributing properties to the poor,” he says. “The Maoists made that promise, but they were not from this place. Their work was for other people. We work for the local people. We are local to this district. We are local people fighting for local people.”

As I leave Karmuhan, a large group of Madhesi villagers gather around Utrkarsh and the other TLF commanders, listening to their promises to fight for Madhesi rights.

Senior leaders of the Terai Liberation Front tour land captured from Pahadis that they claim will be given to local madhesi people.

Senior leaders of the Terai Liberation Front tour land captured from Pahadis that they claim will be given to local Madhesi people. image copyright 2009 Justin Vela

“I was good with all communities, but I was about to lose my life,” says Gopal Chaudry.

Chaudry is the Tharu principal of an ethnically mixed high school in Nawalpur, a town not far from where I met the TLF. During the Madhesi Uprising in 2007, Chaudry received a call from a Pahadi friend who was being threatened by the Madhesi in his village. Believing that his reputation would keep them safe, Chaudry went to his friend’s village and attempted to help him and his family escape the Madhesi crowds outside of his home.

Before they could leave the village they were stopped by a group of Madhesi, thrown off their motorcycles and beaten on the ground. “I was sure they were going to cut us up into small pieces,” Chaudry says. “They were going to kill us.”

Chaudry and his friend were saved only by the intervention of local Madhesi politicians. “The ethnic tension will only get worse,” he says. “Every group is in search of their rights. They all need better rights written into the constitution, but it is impossible that everyone will be satisfied.”

He uses the example of his students to describe the tension in the Terai. “Usually they are all mixed, but during times of violence they separate into the different groups. They are more comfortable that way. They might still play together, but against each other. The Tharu against the Madhesi…The Pahadi against the Tharu…once the trouble has passed they mostly go back to being normal. The situation goes up and down. I certainly feel the threat. During the day it is not yet a problem to move. At night no one is safe.”

He adds, “There is a lack of security. People can’t feel the presence of the government.”

The growing indigenous conflict makes clear that despite the 2006 peace agreement that ended the civil war, Nepal still cannot be consider a truly post-conflict society. The Maoist struggle, it appears, has only taken the lid off a host of issues that the monarchy suppressed through the use of force. The shift to democracy, while positive, has not been accompanied by the necessary government oversight or action and the people, especially the indigenous groups in the Terai, have only the lesson that force is the only way to be heard in the chaos that is Nepal’s government.

“The root cause of all this that Nepal was ruled for two hundred and fifty years by the Pahadi, the people of the highest caste,” says Dr. Ram Joshi, a founding member of the Congress Party which began agitating for the Nepalese monarchy to become more democratic in the 1950s.

In the fifth floor office of a Kathmandu orphanage that houses children of people killed during Nepal’s recently ended civil war, Joshi, who has been called by some the “Ghandi of Nepal” and is respected by all parties, reflects on the future that is quickly closing in on Nepal. “It will be the Terai that poses the most problems,” he says.

Joshi describes how, subsequent to its founding in 1768, the monarchy declared all people to be Nepali; all of one culture, one religion, one language. This was a profoundly false construction. Nepal was in fact composed of more than one hundred ethnic groups, whose lands the monarchy unified into a single state.

The establishment of this homogenized society was carried out by the elites from the Kathmandu Valley, whom the indigenous people in the Terai referred to as the ‘hill people’ or Pahadi. The Pahadi forcibly took land from the indigenous people and became owners of large estates in the Terai. Unable to stay in the Terai year round because of the large amounts of malaria carrying mosquitos during the summer months, the Pahadi employed the Madhesi, who arrived in the Terai about five hundred years ago from India, to act as landlords and governors. The caste system used by the Madhesi was similar to the caste system used in Kathmandu and, because of this similarity to the elites, the Madhesi quickly grew in power compared to other indigenous groups in the Terai.  After a malaria eradication campaign in the 1950s however, Pahadi people were able to live year round in the Terai, becoming the wealthiest landowners and treating the Madhesi and other indigenous people such as the Tharu as virtual slaves.

“There was the hegemony of a particular class,” Joshi says. “The Pahadi people have also sacrificed for the Terai though. They have built roads and schools, but the indigenous people do not count that. They see the Pahadi that live in the Terai and the elites in Kathmandu as the enemy.”

After the establishment of democracy the indigenous people were disappointed that the Maoists did not address their lack of equal representation and land rights, as they had long promised. Smiling gently and sipping from a cup of milk tea, Joshi quotes George Orwell to describe what the indigenous people discovered about the form of democracy in Nepal: “We are all equal, but some are more equal.” He criticizes the Congress Party for failing to establish a more inclusive democracy in Nepal before the Maoists came to power. “The Nepali Congress saw themselves as the vanguard of democracy. That narrow view was reflected in the democracy they established. I am a member of the Congress Party, but I am speaking in the defense of the indigenous people.”

While he scoffs at the Madhesi armed groups and refers to them as opportunistic criminals, Joshi supports the indigenous people. He worries however that the increasing ethnic tension and numerous groups asserting conflicting demands have created a situation that is quickly deteriorating.

“The discontent is already in their heart. It has not been able to erupt until now. People are more educated, aware, and conscious than ever before and they are being pushed by engaged leaders,” he says. “I don’t know where this will lead Nepal. The people are becoming very emotional. This time they are asserting their rights vigorously and violently. That they have become so bold reflects an administration that has alienated them.”

Nepali journalist Tilak Pokharael goes a step further. “ What the Madhesi armed groups are doing with the land below the highway is ethnic cleansing,” he says. “None of the parties wish to risk isolating any of the indigenous groups and risk losing them as future voters. This leaves the indigenous groups to take matters into their own hands.”

Written by Justin Vela

September 14, 2009 at 8:44 am

Posted in Asia

Tagged with , , , ,